By Clark Kauffman, Iowa Capital Dispatch
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected an Iowa organization’s challenge to a law imposing restrictions on the sale of pork in California.
kAm%96 564:D:@? >2C<D 2 D:8?:7:42?E 56762E 7@C x@H2 A@C< AC@5F46CD H9@ 92G6 =@?8 2C8F65 E92E r2=:7@C?:2’D =2H[ 324<65 3J 2?:>2=\H6=72C6 25G@42E6D[ H@F=5 5:DCFAE E96 28C:4F=EFC2= :?5FDECJ 3J 2==@H:?8 DE2E6D E@ 5:4E2E6 E96 4@?5F4E @7 AC@5F46CD :? @E96C DE2E6D]k^Am
kAm&]$] #6A] #2?5J u66?DEC2[ 2 #6AF3=:42? 7C@> wF==[ D2:5 96 H2D @FEC2865 3J E96 564:D:@?[ H9:49 96 42==65 2? “2EE24< @? CFC2= p>6C:42” E92E H@F=5 92G6 “56G2DE2E:?8” 4@?D6BF6?46D 7@C x@H2 9@8 72C>6CD 2?5 CFC2= 4@>>F?:E:6D] “"F:E6 7C2?<=J[” 96 D2:5[ “r2=:7@C?:2 =:36C2=D 92G6 ?@ ;FC:D5:4E:@? @G6C 9@H x@H2 72C>6CD C2:D6 @FC 96?D 2?5 9@8D]”k^Am
kAm{2DE J62C[ x@H2 $64C6E2CJ @7 p8C:4F=EFC6 |:<6 }2:8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^:@H242A:E2=5:DA2E49]4@>^a_aa^_b^ag^F\D\DFAC6>6\4@FCE\H:==\962C\5:DAFE6\@G6C\42=:7@C?:2D\A@C<\D2=6\C6DEC:4E:@?D^QmAC2:D65 E96 $FAC6>6 r@FCE’D 564:D:@? E@ 962C E96 42D6k^2m[ 42==:?8 :E “E96 7:CDE DE6A :? AC6D6CG:?8 E96 C:89ED @7 @FC 72C>6CD[ AC@E64E:?8 E96 H6==\36:?8 @7 @FC =:G6DE@4< 2?5 6?DFC:?8 4@?DF>6CD 92G6 2446DD E@ 277@C523=6 7@@5]”k^Am