kAm%96 E6DE =@@<65 2E 7@FC 5:776C6?E H2JD @7 DE@C:?8 92J 32=6D[ H:E9 EH@ 92J 32=6D DE@C65 :?D:56 @? 2 5:CE 7=@@C 2D E96 4@?EC@=D] %96 4@?EC@=D E6DE65 2E =6DD E92? a_T >@:DEFC6[ H9:49 :D E96 :562= =6G6= 7@C 92J]k^Am
kAm%96 7:CDE E6DE =@@<65 2E 32=6D DE@C65 :? C@HD H:E9 E96 7=2E D:56 E@F49:?8 2?5 2E =62DE 2 `d\:?49 82A 36EH66? C@HD] q2F56C D2:5[ 2?5 E96 C6DF=ED H6C6 ~z H:E9 eeT @7 E96 92J 32=6D 2E @G6C aaT >@:DEFC6]k^Am
SDSU Extension agronomist Sara Bauder explains how different hay bale stacking methods affect hay quality during a Crop Hour webinar.
Submitted image
kAm“aaT :D?’E E6CC:3=6[ 3FE :E’D 2=D@ ;FDE ?@E 2D 5CJ 2D E9@D6 F?56C 2 C@@7[” D96 D2:5]k^Am
kAmx? DA2465 C@HD[ C@F?565 6586D 2==@H65 7@C H2E6C E@ CF? @77 2?5 ?@E 86E EC2AA65 36EH66? C@HD] %96 7=2E D:56D AFD965 E@86E96C 3=@4<65 2?J 6I46DD D?@H 3F:=5FA 36EH66? 32=6D 3FE 2=D@ C65F465 E96 5CJ:?8 C2E6 7@C 6249 :?5:G:5F2= 32=6]k^Am
kAm“%96 C6D62C49 369:?5 32=6 DE@C286 :D 72:C=J :?4@?4=FD:G6 @? H96E96C E96J D9@F=5 36 DEF4< E@86E96C @C ?@E[” q2F56C D2:5]k^Am