Should the four-member conservative majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court decide a case involving groups that spent more than $8 million to get them elected?
People are also reading…
- Finding her niche on family farm: Newman Grove farm wife builds pork business
- Wildfires: Yearning to help, prompted to plan
- Meristem focuses on reducing crop input costs for farmers
- Missouri cowgirl bakes to fund her trick-riding ambitions
- Morrell, Stockyards made a mark on Sioux Falls history
- Fast-Dohrmann-Strommen 55th Annual Production Sale
- Effertz Key Ranch 48th Annual Bull Sale
- Leland Red Angus & Koester Red Angus
- Highmore cattleman elected to American Simmental board
- Researchers experiment with agrivoltaics
- Helping wildfire victims, the Nebraska way
- First South Dakotan named chairman of U.S. Soybean Export Council
- Commitment core of Ralston FFA Chapter
- Rebounding from stray voltage, farmer recharges
- New policies affect spread of alternative energy sites
Code of Judicial Conduct
Relevant portions of the ethics code for judges in Wisconsin:
Effect of campaign contributions. A judge shall not be required to recuse himself or herself in a proceeding based solely on any endorsement or the judge's campaign committee's receipt of a lawful campaign contribution, including a campaign contribution from an individual or entity involved in the proceeding.
Effect of independent communications. A judge shall not be required to recuse himself or herself in a proceeding where such recusal would be based solely on the sponsorship of an independent or issue advocacy communication ... by an individual or entity involved in the proceeding or a donation to an organization that sponsors an independent communication by an individual or entity involved in the proceeding.
Be the first to know
Get local news delivered to your inbox!





